Act of God Clause in Agreement

作者 : 北星情感 本文共6314个字,预计阅读时间需要16分钟 发布时间: 2022-01-22 共92人阅读

In the midst of the COVID-19 chaos, companies are relying on force majeure clauses in their contracts to avoid liability in the performance of their contractual obligations. The extent to which the force majeure clause releases them, in whole or in part, from their contractual obligations is unclear. Depending on the wording of the contract and the circumstances of an individual case, the force majeure clause cannot offer a complete and permanent exemption from the performance of the contract. It cannot allow the encumbered party to delay performance and only until the force majeure event has ended. In general, a state of health, such as cancer, would not be considered a case of force majeure. That is, sudden cancer diagnoses resemble force majeure events in that they are unpredictable and uncontrollable. Although some contracts contain a force majeure clause, they are unusual in other contracts, such as . B a marriage contract. The party wishing to apologize for the performance due to a case of force majeure or force majeure should consult the law of the applicable State. State law regulates the application of these contractual provisions. In some states, the force majeure event must be unforeseen, and the party wishing to invoke the force majeure clause must attempt to fulfill its contractual obligations despite the incident.

However, other states do not have additional conditions for invoking the force majeure clause. The party claiming an unreasonable burden due to the force majeure event bears the burden of proof. Failure to comply with these state laws could result in the non-executive party breaching the contract. In business, the term “force majeure” is not associated with any particular religion or belief system. Contractual languages relating to force majeure are called force majeure clauses, which are often used by insurance companies. These clauses generally limit or eliminate liability for injury, damage and loss caused by force majeure. Force majeure does not automatically exempt a party`s contractual performance obligations. In order to invoke the force majeure provision or force majeure clause, a party must be proactive and take the following steps: The court`s tendency to interpret force majeure clauses narrowly means that the COVID-19 outbreak may not be an event that exempts a party from performing a contract under this clause. But there may be other arguments in favor of apologizing for the performance. The service may be provided under other force majeure provisions such as lockdowns or quarantines, or, where applicable, the Uniform Commercial Code releases the parties from the performance of a contract if this has been rendered impracticable or impossible. As an entrepreneur, you enter into many contracts.

They enter into contracts with suppliers of supplies, goods, equipment, goods, services and sites. They conclude contracts with owners, commercial management companies, cleaning and maintenance companies. They enter into contracts with employees, independent contractors and professional service providers. Something that is probably common to all these contracts is a force majeure clause. A force majeure clause generally provides that if an extraordinary event occurs and is beyond the control of a company, the performance of that company`s contract may be suspended or excused. A typical list of force majeure events includes war, riots, fires, floods, hurricanes, typhoons, earthquakes, lightning, explosions, strikes, lockouts, slowdowns, persistent energy shortages, and government or government measures that prohibit or prevent a party from fulfilling its respective obligations under the contract. Thus, for example, if a hurricane has occurred that has paralyzed a port, the seller who plans to ship his goods through that port is not responsible for the late delivery of the goods. The question is therefore whether a viral pandemic falls into the category of force majeure.

As mentioned above, force majeure clauses release one or both parties from the performance of their obligations when circumstances occur or events beyond their control occur. These circumstances make the performance of the contract so cumbersome that its performance is impracticable or impossible. Even contracts that contain force majeure clauses risk being sued if the clauses are vague, generic or poorly worded. Indeed, in disputes relating to construction contracts, it is common for the parties to argue over events that are specifically “force majeure” or not. Disputes of this kind often depend on a judge`s decision as to whether the event in question was “reasonably foreseeable”. If the event was not reasonably foreseeable – such as the rapid melting of an unusually large amount of snow that causes the withdrawals to erupt and unprecedented flooding – then the event is likely to be considered a case of force majeure and the Party`s failure to perform, at least for a certain period of time, will be excused. If the event was reasonably foreseeable — such as a fifty-mile-per-hour wind gust blowing on I-80 — it will determine that the event is not force majeure, and the injured party will therefore not be excused for its non-performance. A well-formulated construction contract avoids the costs and risks associated with litigation. Two parties – let`s call them builder and owner – tolerate the construction of a house on the owner`s property.

The contract between the builder and the owner states that “the builder must complete the house by noon on the first day of July, unless an unforeseen force majeure occurs. After working diligently on the house throughout the summer, the builder was horrified on June 30 when he learned that a tornado had torn their construction site apart, uprooted the house (almost completed) and delayed the project by several months. The next afternoon, the owner arrives at his property and is furious to find only a pile of rubble. In this case, a contract containing a properly worded force majeure clause would protect the builder from any liability to the owner for the technical breach of his contract. “The judge interpreting an agreement in accordance with that criterion must first determine, on the basis of the language of the agreement, what a reasonable person in the situation of the parties would have meant at the time of its conclusion. Moreover, if the wording of the contract is clear and unambiguous, there is no room for interpretation, and a court must presume that the parties meant what they expressed. In these circumstances, the real test of what is meant by this is not what the parties meant, but what a reasonable person in the parties` position would have thought. Therefore, the clear and unambiguous wording of an agreement will not reveal what the parties believed the agreement meant or intended to mean. If the wording of the contract is clear and unambiguous and in the absence of fraud, coercion or error, the evidence will not be admissible to demonstrate the intention of the parties or to change, amend or contradict the terms of this Agreement. (Quotes omitted.) It`s also worth noting that while force majeure clauses are typically used in natural disaster circumstances — such as the catastrophic Nebraska floods in 2019 — cautious wording can also extend a clause`s coverage to a variety of other unforeseen or unpredictable circumstances, ranging from labor strikes and industry-wide material shortages to acts of terrorism. .

开通VIP 享更多特权,建议使用QQ登录